Nuclear weapons derive their power from the energy released when a heavy nucleus is divided, called fission or when light nuclei are forced together, called fusion. In fission, a nucleus from a heavy element is bombarded with neutrons. The nucleus breaks into two pieces, releasing energy and two or more neutrons. Each of these neutrons has enough energy to split another heavy nucleus writing an essay about someone, allowing the process to repeat itself. The United States nuclear weapons program poses serious health risks to its citizens. A combination of secrecy, lax enforcement, reckless neglect and an emphasis on production at the cost of health environmental essay pollution, safety and the environment created toxic and radioactive pollution at thousands of sites around the country. United States nuclear weapons production facilities have left a mess that, if it can be cleaned up at all, will take decades and billions of dollars. Also, a great amount of United States citizens were needlessly exposed to high levels of radiation. Nuclear weapons are weapons of great destruction. Our government wastes over thirty-three billion dollars a year of our tax money. Also, nuclear weapons pose serious health risks to those around them, including the citizens of the United States. There has not been a significant impact on world affairs by nuclear weapons since World War II. For these reasons, I feel that the United States should reduce its nuclear arsenal. “Nuclear Weapons in the Twenty-First Century.” Federation of American Scientists. N.p. n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2013. <http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/doctrine/doe/younger.htm>. At the same time, it is unclear why governments strive to produce and maintain such vast amounts of nuclear warheads. According to the data of the American Arms Control Association, today the USA and Russia own about 5,000 nuclear warheads each (ACA). Though the idea of storing such numbers of warheads is justified by the necessity to protect said countries and their allies, it still does not make real sense. Considering the destructive power of weapons produced today, as well as the fact that nuclear warheads are not meant to be used for assault essay example how to, it seems that 10 times lower amounts would be enough for the proclaimed goals. This would relieve the economy persuasive writing speech topics, and besides, prove the peaceful intentions of all countries which own weapons of mass destruction. A limited time offer! To conclude, the fact is that if every country were to have the right to possess nuclear weapons we would all be living in constant fear of attack. Our lives would be very different; we would be insecure with regards to our safety and this would impact greatly on how we lived our lives – we would need to be significantly more vigilant. A small example of this is the potential effect that liquid explosives has on air travel where we can’t take any fluids that are more than 100ml into an airport. That is just for liquid explosives, what limits would be required to ensure nuclear components weren’t being smuggled? If one country were to drop a bomb it would set off a chain reaction, all it would take is for one rogue state or organisation to detonate a bomb and the world would effectively end through nuclear Armageddon. Type of paper: Thesis/Dissertation Chapter On the 6th November 1945, a United States bomber flew towards the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The only cargo aboard that B-29 bomber was an atomic bomb – ironically nicknamed “Little Boy” – that was to be dropped on its target. At 8.15am and at a height of around 2,000ft the bomb exploded above Hiroshima, taking 140,000 lives with it. Most of the 140,000 died instantly how to write a speech, horrifyingly the rest of the innocent civilians that were not in direct contact with the bomb died painful deaths in the four months following. They died from radiation sickness and different types of cancers. Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as: “Totally irrational, totally inhumane scholarship essay for teachers, good for nothing but killing, possibly leading to the destruction of life on Earth and civilisation.” He spoke nothing but the truth. US President Reagan was a nuclear abolitionist. He believed that the only reason to have nuclear weaponry was to prevent the Soviet Union from using theirs. Between them alone the United States and Russia have more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons. Why do these countries feel the need to posses so many nuclear warheads? Dominance, power and paranoia. Although some of their weapons may simply just be left over from the Cold War, this is not an excuse. They could have easily been destroyed by now. Countries like Russia and the United States crave power. In modern times the most important substance to guarantee power is weapons. Countries in possession of nuclear weapons use them to scare and intimidate other nations. One day this could backfire and the consequences would be deadly. Take North Korea and America. When Kim-Jong Un tried to invade South Korea, Barack Obama threatened them with an atomic bomb. As soon as that was done North Korea knew they had a major diplomatic issue and rescinded their threat. A major threat to world peace is the potential issue that certain smaller countries are likely to rebel against being manipulated and not having the ability to retaliate. To ensure that they avoid being bullied by bigger powers they may start to produce their own nuclear warheads. As previously stated atmosphere essay, the reason two superpowers like Russia and the United States maintain a significant arsenal of nuclear weaponry is down to the fact that frankly, they are paranoid. If you can stockpile most of the nuclear warheads in the world then surely nobody could ever harm your country. This is certainly not the case. By having so many dangerous weapons you are not only a bigger threat to potential enemies but practically there is the additional threat that Terrorists could pose if they ever managed to secure or steal some of these weapons. Get custom Essay sample written according to your requirements The world’s leaders support the preservation of nuclear weapons due to their effective function as deterrents. However, the growing supply of nuclear weapons has caused leading researchers to be worried about the destruction that the weapons can cause and how the weapons can fall into the wrong hands. The reality is that if we want to protect the world and to keep the billions of people safe, we need to eliminate nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons have caused mass destruction throughout their time on earth. Their power was demonstrated on Japan writing thesis statements esl, which killed hundreds of thousands of civilians. Hundreds of thousands of civilians do not need to die again, so we need to stop the possibility of it happening. Nuclear weapons are far too dangerous and there are too many possible threats. It is time that the world gave up nuclear weapons. Many people support nuclear weapons because of their effective function as deterrents and their ability to preserve the balance and order in the world. The main defense for nuclear weapons comes from the idea that nuclear weapons are acting as deterrents. Numerous researchers have studied the effectiveness of this function and describe how “the percentage of the world’s population lost to war each year dropped dramatically with the onset of nuclear deterrence” (Payne). The destructive force of nuclear weapons really has kept the nations of the world at bay. Countries will now think twice before attacking the United States, Russia, or any other country with a supply of nuclear weapons. Even countries with a supply of nuclear weapons do not want to engage in nuclear war; not because they will lose, but because of the destruction that each country would have to face to gain victory. As a result, several researchers disagree and are worried about the Obama administration’s move towards completely removing nuclear weapons. On April 8, 2010, United States President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev “signed the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) to replace START I.” (“Military Affairs”). This treaty continued to limit the amount of nuclear warheads that each nation could have. However, researchers believe that a shift to a world without nuclear weapons would cause too much damage. The resulting mentality of the countries would be back to that of pre-World War II times. Countries would begin to wage war annually, and casualties would begin to pile up. The countries of the world will no longer have to worry about the threat of nuclear weapons and will begin annual onslaughts with other weaponry. Another major concern is that “any nuclear country with sensible leaders” will not give up all its nuclear weapons and will cheat (Sagan and Waltz). The United States cannot force nuclear deterrence on the world. If the United States moves into nuclear disarmament, certain countries will refuse to give up their nuclear weapons and may hide supplies of nuclear weapons in secret locations. The result is that the tables will turn on the United States. The United States will be disarmed, but other countries will be effectively armed with nuclear weapons. The United States and the rest of the world would become subject to these nuclear countries. The argument that many people are giving is that removing nuclear weapons is not only a bad idea, but is also impossible. There is no absolute way to make the rest of the world completely give up nuclear weapons. Another major issue with removing nuclear weapons is that all the panic in the world about nuclear weapons has “led to many policies that turned out to be wasteful and unnecessary” (Mueller). Nuclear disarmament has cost the world a significant amount of money. Policies towards nuclear disarmament have been continuously draining funds. Furthermore how to write a good thesis, the policies also drove the United States to war with Iraq because of the fear that “Sadamm Hussein’s […] technologically dysfunctional regime in Iraq could in time obtain nuclear weapons” (Mueller). This war cost the United States a great deal of money and created great amounts of conflict and casualties. Now, the world is focusing on the activities of North Korea and even more on Iraq. If these countries began to build up a supply of nuclear weapons short term career goals essay mba, the result would be horrific because of the economic struggle the countries would go through before and after creating the weapons. However, other researchers in the world support nuclear disarmament and want an end to the fear in the world of nuclear arms. Many world leaders claim that nuclear weapons are vital shields for the planet. They claim that nuclear weapons are deterrents that prevent the world from breaking out in total war. Researchers are supporting this argument by declaring how nuclear weapons have been keeping peace. However, other researchers and scientists deny the effectiveness of nuclear weapons as deterrents and declare that nuclear weapons will lead the world into total devastation. Although it is evident that effects of a nuclear bomb are extremely destructive when examining human effects, environment effects and danger elements, these mentioned are only some of the many scientists have begun to study. One idea draws all of these points together though, and that is the fact that even a small nuclear bomb is powerful and could take the lives of thousands. Innocent people die because of these devastating effects and nothing any doctor can do will fix that. Once a nuclear bomb goes off, nothing can stop it, and thousands of men and women will die in just seconds before they even know anything had happened. One would most likely know that nuclear weapons are extremely dangerous, but how dangerous they are depends on three main elements. The first element is how much energy a bomb contains. A megaton is the amount of energy released by one million tons of TNT. While today most average nuclear bombs have yields of less than that, the Hiroshima bomb was zero point two megatons. However at present the majority of large nuclear bombs are eight to forty times that. The largest nuclear bomb operational at this time is a Russian hydrogen bomb, which consists of fifty megatons. That amount is equal to fifty millions tons of TNT and the effects of it could eradicate the human race. The second element is the weapon's speed. A blast wave is a wave of over pressured air that forms a fraction of a second after the bomb detonates. This wave can travel up to twelve miles in just fifty seconds from a one megaton bomb. It could also severely injure anyone or thing in that mile radius. The third dangerous element is the surrounding climate. For example good scientific essay topics, the effects of the bomb would vary greatly if a wind was blowing at the time of explosion. Fires that are ignited would then create more smoke and produce a greater possibility for sun absorption by the clouds, which could cause massive effects on the environment.
0 Reacties
Laat een antwoord achter. |
ArchievenCategorieën |